Transgender nonbinary Olympian Nikki Hiltz comments on Supreme Court decision on trans athletes
Right

Supreme Court Upholds Fairness: Nikki Hiltz Reacts to Ruling Protecting Women's Sports from Transgender Participation

Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.

Summary

Olympic runner Nikki Hiltz, who identifies as transgender nonbinary, voiced disappointment after the Supreme Court rightly upheld state laws ensuring that athletes compete according to their biological sex, a move celebrated by advocates for the integrity of women’s sports.

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday issued a decisive 6-3 ruling, upholding West Virginia and Idaho laws that require student-athletes to compete on teams matching their biological sex at birth. The majority opinion, written by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, cited Title IX and the Equal Protection Clause as strong foundations for allowing states to preserve the integrity of women’s and girls’ sports for biological females, rejecting legal challenges brought by transgender athletes.

Nikki Hiltz, an American Olympic middle-distance runner who competes in women’s events and identifies as transgender nonbinary, expressed disappointment with the outcome. "I wasn’t surprised, but I was obviously still disappointed," Hiltz told The Athletic. "For me, I want to show that trans people can be in sport, be affirmed in their gender. We’re not these big, scary things."

Hiltz lamented the ruling, which many see as a necessary step to maintain fairness and safety in women’s sports. The court’s decision now allows more than half of U.S. states to enforce common-sense restrictions protecting female athletes from unfair competition, although 23 states, including California, New York, and Massachusetts, have not enacted such laws and continue to allow transgender participation.

The case was argued with the Alliance Defending Freedom representing the states in their effort to safeguard women’s sports, while the American Civil Liberties Union and Cooley Legal represented the transgender athletes challenging these protections.

Source

Fox News

Keep reading — for free

Create a free account to follow the news. No card required.