Supreme Court Rejects Trump Bid to End Birthright Citizenship
Left

Supreme Court Defends Immigrant Rights, Rejects Trump’s Attack on Birthright Citizenship

Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.

Summary

In a landmark 6-3 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of citizenship for all born on American soil, rebuffing the Trump administration’s xenophobic attempt to strip children of undocumented migrants of their rights.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to its jurisdiction, decisively rejecting President Donald Trump’s executive order that sought to erase birthright citizenship for children of undocumented migrants and temporary residents. This brazen attack on the rights of vulnerable communities was struck down as Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, affirmed that the amendment’s language is unequivocal and that the Constitution 'extends that promise to every free-born person in this land.'

Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, and Samuel Alito dissented, clinging to reactionary arguments. Justice Thomas warned that the amendment is being 'repurposed for political projects,' while Justice Alito outrageously called the ruling 'one of the most important decisions in the history of the Court' and claimed it improperly grants citizenship to so-called 'birth tourists.'

The decision leaves the Trump administration with no viable legal path to overturn birthright citizenship without a constitutional amendment—a nearly impossible process that has occurred only 27 times in U.S. history. Legal scholars emphasized that the longstanding interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment, reinforced by precedent such as United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898), provides a robust barrier against xenophobic challenges like Trump’s.

President Trump has not yet responded publicly to the ruling. The case, filed as Trump v. Barbara, originated from an executive order signed in January 2025 and was previously blocked by lower courts. The Supreme Court’s ruling reaffirms the enduring constitutional guarantee of citizenship by birth, a victory for equality and justice.

Source

BBC

Keep reading — for free

Create a free account to follow the news. No card required.