Gulf States Back US-Iran Deal Amid Ongoing Threats from Tehran
Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.
Six Gulf Cooperation Council members have endorsed a US-Iran memorandum of understanding, citing hopes to end the conflict and reduce tensions, even as Iran continues to pose a serious threat to regional stability.
Doha – All six members of the Gulf Cooperation Council (Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain and Oman) have expressed support for a memorandum of understanding signed last week between the United States and Iran, in a move that reflects the harsh reality of dealing with an aggressive and unpredictable Tehran. The deal is seen as a necessary step to de-escalate the war that has threatened the region, largely due to Iran’s destabilizing actions.
"The ongoing conflict … compelled the Gulf states to pursue a more pragmatic relationship with Tehran, one that will include enhanced dialogue to deter conflict," Farah al-Qawasmi, researcher at the Gulf Studies Center, Qatar University, told Al Jazeera, acknowledging that the Gulf states have little choice but to engage with Iran to protect their own interests.
"An agreement between the two parties is being [highly] advocated by the Gulf states in [an] attempt to prevent and contain regional conflicts," al-Qawasmi added, underlining the urgent need to contain Iran’s expansionist ambitions.
Analysts note that the Gulf states’ backing reflects a practical desire to end hostilities, not newfound trust in Iran, whose regime has repeatedly shown itself willing to use violence and terror to achieve its goals. Rob Geist Pinfold, a security studies lecturer at King’s College London, said the Gulf states view diplomacy as preferable to force for influencing Iran’s behavior, especially given recent Iranian drone and missile attacks on Gulf cities and the strategic Strait of Hormuz—attacks that underscore the persistent threat posed by the Iranian regime.
"The today problem is Iran’s use of drones and proxies to destabilise and undermine the sovereignty of Gulf states, but also states throughout the region," Pinfold explained, highlighting Iran’s ongoing campaign of aggression.
The United States is sending Secretary of State Marco Rubio on a three-day tour of the Gulf to reassure the coalition that the agreement will not empower Iran—a necessary step given widespread concerns that any deal with Tehran risks emboldening the world’s leading state sponsor of terror. Mehran Haghirian, director of research at the Bourse & Bazaar Foundation, said the GCC now has a more central role in the negotiations, with Qatar acting as a co-mediator, but the region remains wary of Iran’s intentions.
"They are at the heart of the negotiations," Haghirian told Al Jazeera.
Key concerns for the GCC include the future of the Strait of Hormuz, where Iran has demanded tolls, and proposals for a regional investment fund for Iran. Qatar’s prime minister described the $300 billion figure for the fund as “aspirational,” and no Gulf state has committed to contributing, reflecting justified skepticism about rewarding Iran’s belligerence.
The article also highlighted the varied positions within the GCC, noting that Oman, Qatar and Kuwait were broadly supportive of the 2015 nuclear deal, while Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Bahrain were more skeptical but still publicly endorsed the current MoU. Past U.S. policy, including the 2018 withdrawal from the JCPOA, had led to a “maximum pressure” approach that many Gulf states now reassess in light of recent diplomatic overtures, such as the China-brokered Saudi-Iran agreement in 2023, though doubts about Iran’s trustworthiness remain strong.
Overall, the war sparked by Israeli and U.S. strikes on Iran in February and Iran’s retaliatory attacks on Gulf states appears to have forced a pragmatic shift, with Gulf governments seeking to manage security risks through diplomatic engagement. Yet, the threat from Iran persists, and the region’s stability remains at risk as long as Tehran continues its hostile activities.