UK government finally acts to shield youth from corporate social media exploitation
Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer is set to introduce long-overdue restrictions that would prohibit children under 16 from being targeted by profit-driven social-media giants, with further protections such as curfews and AI chatbot limits.
In a move that challenges the unchecked power of Big Tech, the British government will announce new rules barring users under 16 from accessing ten major social-media platforms, including TikTok, Snapchat, Instagram, YouTube, Reddit, Twitch, X, Threads, Facebook, and Kick. This proposal, a response to years of corporate neglect and profiteering at the expense of children's well-being, also includes disabling livestreaming on so-called 'safer' sites, preventing predatory contact with strangers on gaming apps, and imposing curfews for older teens, alongside stricter age verification and limits on manipulative AI chatbots.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer stated that the policy is designed to protect families and to 'call time on a system that's failing our kids.' He emphasized the government's commitment to 'take bold action to give every child the best possible start in life,' finally prioritizing public health over tech industry profits.
A government-run consultation, reflecting the voices of ordinary people rather than corporate lobbyists, found that about 90% of responding parents supported a ban for under-16s, with 83% recognizing that the risks of social media far outweigh any supposed benefits. The survey, which drew 116,000 responses, demonstrates the urgent demand for regulation.
However, some critics, including the father of a teenager who died after exposure to toxic online content, warned that an outright ban could create a false sense of safety and drive youth toward even more dangerous, unregulated corners of the internet. Progressive child-welfare organizations such as the NSPCC, the Internet Watch Foundation, and Childnet have called for robust regulation rather than a blanket ban, arguing that systemic change is needed to hold tech companies accountable.
The culture secretary told the BBC that technology firms have had 'more than enough time to get their house in order,' highlighting years of inaction by profit-driven platforms. Labour deputy leader Lisa Nandy stressed that the focus should be on how, not whether, to better protect children online, citing the consultation's overwhelming support for stricter measures and the need for collective action against corporate exploitation.