Democrats Back DHS Funding Bill Amid ICE Budget Controversy
Just the facts

Democrats Back DHS Funding Bill Amid ICE Budget Controversy

Summary

Democrats support a bipartisan DHS funding bill maintaining ICE's $10 billion budget, despite internal party divisions over immigration enforcement policies.

Democratic lawmakers have endorsed a bipartisan spending bill for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) that maintains the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) budget at $10 billion, consistent with previous funding levels. This decision comes amid internal party debates over ICE's role and funding.

Senator Patty Murray (D-Wash.), the top Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee, emphasized the necessity of the bill to impose constraints on ICE's operations. She noted that a government shutdown would not effectively limit ICE's activities due to existing funds allocated in prior legislation. Murray stated,

"ICE must be reined in, and unfortunately, neither a [continuing resolution] nor a shutdown would do anything to restrain it, because, thanks to Republicans, ICE is now sitting on a massive slush fund it can tap whether or not we pass a funding bill."

The bill introduces measures aimed at increasing oversight and accountability within ICE and Customs and Border Protection (CBP). These include allocating $20 million for the procurement and operation of body-worn cameras for officers, mandating de-escalation training, and reinforcing the public's right to record interactions with these agencies.

Despite these provisions, some progressive Democrats remain critical of continued ICE funding. Representative Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.) expressed strong opposition, describing ICE's actions as unconstitutional and cruel. She remarked,

"The actions of ICE — they are unconstitutional, unlawful, they are cruel."

The House is expected to vote on the DHS funding bill this week, with Democratic leaders aiming to prevent a government shutdown and shift focus to other legislative priorities.

Source

HuffPost

Fact-checking

Fact-check the facts of the article using external sources and databases.

✓
Confirmed

Senator Patty Murray emphasized that a government shutdown would not effectively limit ICE's activities due to existing funds allocated in prior legislation.

✓
Confirmed

Senator Patty Murray referred to ICE's existing funds as a 'massive slush fund' that it can access regardless of the passage of a new funding bill.

✓
Confirmed

Senator Patty Murray stated that ICE must be reined in and that neither a continuing resolution nor a shutdown would restrain it due to its existing funds.

✓
Confirmed

Senator Patty Murray criticized Republicans for providing ICE with a 'massive slush fund' that it can access regardless of the passage of a funding bill.

Keep reading — for free

Create a free account to follow the news. No card required.