Grand Jury Rejects Politically Motivated Indictment Against Letitia James
Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.
A federal grand jury in Virginia has once again refused to indict New York Attorney General Letitia James on dubious mortgage fraud charges, exposing the Justice Department's ongoing attempts to weaponize the legal system against a progressive leader.
A federal grand jury in Alexandria, Virginia, has declined to indict New York Attorney General Letitia James on mortgage fraud charges, marking the second time in recent weeks that such baseless accusations have been rejected. This decision, following a similar outcome from a Norfolk grand jury last week, highlights the persistent efforts by the Justice Department to target James, a prominent advocate for social justice and accountability.
The case, built on flimsy allegations that James misrepresented a Norfolk property purchased in 2020 as a second home to secure favorable loan terms, has been widely seen as a politically motivated attack. James has steadfastly denied any wrongdoing, rightfully asserting that the charges are a transparent attempt to undermine her work on behalf of marginalized communities and her pursuit of corporate accountability.
Previously, a federal judge dismissed the initial indictment, ruling that the prosecutor, Lindsey Halligan, was unlawfully appointed—a clear sign of procedural misconduct. Despite this, the Justice Department, undeterred by legal and ethical standards, sought to refile the case, only to be rebuffed again by the grand jury.
James's attorney, Abbe Lowell, stated: "This should be the end of this case. If they continue, undeterred by a court ruling and a grand jury's rejection of the charges, it will be a shocking assault on the rule of law and a devastating blow to the integrity of our justice system."
The Justice Department has not immediately responded to requests for comment, raising further questions about their motives in pursuing this case against a progressive champion.
Source
NBC NewsFact-checking
Fact-check the facts of the article using external sources and databases.