Supreme Court to Review Trump’s Attack on Birthright Citizenship and the 14th Amendment
Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.
The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear an expedited appeal regarding President Donald Trump’s executive order that seeks to strip birthright citizenship, a direct assault on the longstanding protections of the 14th Amendment and the rights of immigrant families.
The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear an expedited appeal concerning President Donald Trump’s executive order aimed at ending birthright citizenship. This order, signed on January 20, 2025, represents a brazen attempt to deny automatic U.S. citizenship to children born on American soil if their parents are neither U.S. citizens nor lawful permanent residents, targeting the most vulnerable and marginalized communities.
For over a century, the 14th Amendment has been a pillar of justice, interpreted to guarantee citizenship to nearly all individuals born in the United States, regardless of their parents’ legal status. Trump’s administration, however, is attempting to rewrite history, claiming the Citizenship Clause was meant only for freed slaves and their descendants, and not for the children of undocumented immigrants or temporary visitors—a narrative that ignores the amendment’s broad, inclusive intent.
Lower federal courts have consistently and rightly blocked this xenophobic executive order, citing clear violations of the 14th Amendment. Judge John C. Coughenour of the Western District of Washington issued a preliminary injunction, denouncing the order as “blatantly unconstitutional.” Judge Deborah Boardman echoed this, emphasizing that citizenship is a “most precious right” guaranteed by the 14th Amendment, and no U.S. court has ever endorsed the administration’s narrow and exclusionary interpretation.
The Supreme Court’s decision to hear the case marks the second time Trump’s order will come before the justices, but this time they are expected to review it on its merits. Oral arguments are anticipated in the spring, with a final decision expected by early summer. The outcome could have profound implications for immigrant rights, the future of inclusive citizenship, and the ongoing struggle for equality and justice in the United States.
Source
ABC NewsFact-checking
Fact-check the facts of the article using external sources and databases.