Supreme Court to Review Constitutionality of Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order
Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.
The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear an expedited appeal concerning President Donald Trump's executive order aimed at ending birthright citizenship, a move that challenges longstanding interpretations of the 14th Amendment.
The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear an expedited appeal concerning President Donald Trump's executive order aimed at ending birthright citizenship. This order, signed on January 20, 2025, seeks to deny automatic U.S. citizenship to children born on American soil if their parents are neither U.S. citizens nor lawful permanent residents.
Historically, the 14th Amendment has been interpreted to guarantee citizenship to nearly all individuals born in the United States, regardless of their parents' legal status. The Trump administration contends that the Citizenship Clause was intended to apply only to freed slaves and their descendants, not to children of undocumented immigrants or temporary visitors.
Lower federal courts have uniformly blocked the executive order, citing violations of the 14th Amendment. For instance, Judge John C. Coughenour of the Western District of Washington issued a preliminary injunction, describing the order as "blatantly unconstitutional." Similarly, Judge Deborah Boardman emphasized that citizenship is a "most precious right" guaranteed by the 14th Amendment, and no U.S. court has supported the administration's interpretation.
The Supreme Court's decision to hear the case marks the second time Trump's order will come before the justices, but this time they are expected to review it on its merits. Oral arguments are anticipated in the spring, with a final decision expected by early summer. The outcome could have significant implications for immigration policy and the interpretation of constitutional rights in the United States.
Source
ABC NewsFact-checking
Fact-check the facts of the article using external sources and databases.