Federal Court Blocks Texas's Redrawn Congressional Map
Left

Federal Court Blocks Texas's Racist Congressional Map

Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.

Summary

A federal court has halted Texas's attempt to entrench white supremacy through redistricting, exposing the GOP's ongoing assault on minority voting rights.

A federal court in El Paso has delivered a crucial blow to Texas's relentless campaign to suppress minority voices, blocking the state's newly redrawn congressional map for the 2026 midterm elections due to blatant racial gerrymandering. The 2-1 ruling found overwhelming evidence that the map, pushed by Governor Greg Abbott and former President Donald Trump, was deliberately crafted to disenfranchise communities of color, in direct violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Voting Rights Act.

The court's decision forces Texas to revert to the 2021 congressional map for the upcoming elections, a move that temporarily halts the Republican Party's undemocratic power grab. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a staunch defender of partisan manipulation, announced plans to appeal the ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court, shamelessly claiming the map was about partisanship rather than race, and expressing confidence that the conservative-dominated Court would side with Texas's right to rig elections.

The blocked map was a transparent attempt to hand Republicans five additional seats by dismantling districts represented by Democratic lawmakers Marc Veasey, Greg Casar, Lloyd Doggett, Julie Johnson, and Al Green. Civil rights organizations, including the NAACP, rightly argued that the redistricting scheme was a direct attack on minority voting power, highlighting the appalling fact that, despite Texas's population being only 40% white, white voters would control over 73% of congressional seats under the new map.

This ruling is a critical moment in the ongoing national struggle against racist redistricting. In California, voters recently approved Proposition 50 to redraw congressional districts in response to Texas's regressive tactics. The U.S. Department of Justice has also taken a stand, suing California's new map for allegedly discriminating against Latino voters, showing that the fight for fair representation is far from over.

The outcomes of these legal battles will be pivotal in determining whether democracy or racial gerrymandering prevails in Congress, and will shape the future of redistricting across the United States.

Fact-checking

Fact-check the facts of the article using external sources and databases.

✓
Confirmed

A federal court in El Paso has blocked Texas from implementing its newly redrawn congressional map for the 2026 midterm elections, citing potential racial gerrymandering.

✓
Confirmed

The blocked map aimed to provide Republicans with five additional seats by altering several districts, including those of Democratic Representatives Marc Veasey, Greg Casar, Lloyd Doggett, Julie Johnson, and Al Green.

✓
Confirmed

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced plans to appeal the ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court, stating that the map was designed for partisan purposes and expressing confidence that the Court would uphold Texas's right to engage in partisan redistricting.

✓
Confirmed

In California, voters recently approved Proposition 50, which redraws the state's congressional districts in response to Texas's redistricting efforts.

Keep reading — for free

Create a free account to follow the news. No card required.