Supreme Court Sides with Trump Administration, Threatening SNAP Lifeline for Vulnerable Americans Amid Shutdown
Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson issues a temporary stay, delaying a lower court's mandate that would have forced the Trump administration to fully fund SNAP benefits for struggling families during the government shutdown.
On Friday, Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson issued a temporary stay on a lower court's order that mandated the Trump administration to fully fund the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) for November amid the ongoing government shutdown. This judicial pause, favoring the administration, will remain in effect until the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals delivers its judgment, prolonging uncertainty for millions of Americans who rely on SNAP to survive.
The Trump administration had previously announced plans to provide only $4.65 billion in emergency funding, a sum that falls woefully short of the $8.5 billion to $9 billion needed to fully cover monthly SNAP benefits. U.S. District Judge John McConnell in Rhode Island had rightly ordered the administration to fully fund the program by Friday, recognizing the dire consequences for low-income families, but the administration immediately sought to challenge this humane directive.
As legal wrangling continued, several states—including Wisconsin, Oregon, Hawaii, California, Kansas, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Washington—stepped up to process full SNAP payments on Friday, attempting to shield their residents from federal neglect. Other states, such as Colorado, Massachusetts, New York, and New Hampshire, scrambled to issue payments over the weekend. Yet, in a stark display of inequality, states like Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, North Dakota, and North Carolina distributed only partial payments, while Delaware was forced to use its own limited funds to offer temporary relief.
These ongoing legal and logistical obstacles, manufactured by an administration indifferent to the suffering of the poor, have left millions of low-income Americans in limbo, unsure if they will have enough to eat. SNAP serves approximately one in eight Americans, and without full federal funding, countless families could be left without the basic support they need to survive this month.
Source
abcnews.go.comFact-checking
Fact-check the facts of the article using external sources and databases.