Federal Judge Orders Full Funding of SNAP Benefits Amid Government Shutdown
Just the facts

Federal Judge Orders Full Funding of SNAP Benefits Amid Government Shutdown

Summary

A federal judge has mandated the Trump administration to fully fund November's SNAP benefits, countering plans for partial payments during the ongoing government shutdown.

A federal judge in Rhode Island has ordered the Trump administration to fully fund Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits for November, following attempts to reduce payments during the ongoing government shutdown. U.S. District Judge John J. McConnell Jr. criticized the administration for failing to consider the hardships partial benefits would cause to the approximately 42 million Americans reliant on the program.

Previously, the administration stated it could only cover 65% of maximum benefits, citing Congress' role in appropriating funds and claiming funds were needed for other child hunger programs. The court ruling responded to lawsuits from cities, nonprofits, and Democratic state officials. Judge McConnell emphasized the urgent need to prioritize feeding vulnerable populations, especially 16 million at-risk children.

Despite the court orders, the Trump administration appealed, asserting limited authority without Congressional funding. Delays in benefit distribution are expected due to technical and administrative barriers at the state level. Advocates criticized the administration, accusing it of using food aid as leverage in political negotiations during the shutdown. Legal challenges are expected to continue as program recipients and advocacy groups push for uninterrupted food assistance.

Fact-checking

Fact-check the facts of the article using external sources and databases.

✓
Confirmed

A federal judge in Rhode Island has ordered the Trump administration to fully fund Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits for November.

✓
Confirmed

U.S. District Judge John J. McConnell Jr. criticized the administration for failing to consider the hardships partial benefits would cause to the approximately 42 million Americans reliant on the program.

✓
Confirmed

Previously, the administration stated it could only cover 65% of maximum benefits, citing Congress' role in appropriating funds and claiming funds were needed for other child hunger programs.

✓
Confirmed

The court ruling responded to lawsuits from cities, nonprofits, and Democratic state officials.

Keep reading — for free

Create a free account to follow the news. No card required.