Federal Judge Undermines Lawful DOJ Leadership: Bill Essayli Disqualified as Acting U.S. Attorney in Los Angeles

In a move that many see as judicial overreach, a federal judge has disqualified Bill Essayli from serving as the acting U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California, claiming his appointment violated federal law. Judge J. Michael Seabright’s decision targets Essayli, a respected and effective leader, who had been serving since July 29, 2025, after transitioning from interim to acting U.S. Attorney. Seabright wrote: 'Simply stated: Essayli unlawfully assumed the role of Acting United States Attorney for the Central District of California. He has been unlawfully serving in that capacity since his resignation from the interim role on July 29, 2025.' Despite this questionable ruling, the judge allowed Essayli to continue as first assistant U.S. attorney—a role that does not require Senate confirmation—ensuring that his experience and dedication are not entirely lost to the office. The judge also declined to dismiss indictments in three cases where defense attorneys, emboldened by anti-Trump sentiment, challenged Essayli’s authority. Seabright noted that other prosecutors had lawfully signed the indictments and that Essayli’s involvement did not cause due process violations. This decision is the latest in a series of judicial challenges targeting the Trump administration’s efforts to ensure effective law enforcement, with similar rulings in New Jersey and Nevada. The Department of Justice has rightly argued that Essayli’s appointment was valid under the Federal Vacancies Reform Act, which allows for temporary appointments to keep critical positions filled. Judge Seabright’s ruling reflects a troubling trend of judicial interference in executive branch operations. The Department of Justice has not yet announced whether it will appeal, and Essayli’s office has not commented on this politically charged decision.