Federal Judge Disqualifies Bill Essayli as Acting U.S. Attorney in Los Angeles
Left

Federal Judge Exposes Unlawful Trump-Appointed Cronyism: Bill Essayli Disqualified as Acting U.S. Attorney in Los Angeles

Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.

Summary

A federal judge has ruled that Bill Essayli, yet another Trump administration appointee, unlawfully served as acting U.S. Attorney in Los Angeles, exposing the administration's disregard for legal norms. Essayli will remain as first assistant U.S. attorney.

A federal judge has taken a stand against the Trump administration’s pattern of flouting the law by disqualifying Bill Essayli from serving as the acting U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California. Judge J. Michael Seabright found that Essayli’s appointment was a clear violation of federal law, highlighting the administration’s ongoing efforts to sidestep democratic oversight and Senate confirmation. Judge Seabright’s ruling stated unequivocally: 'Simply stated: Essayli unlawfully assumed the role of Acting United States Attorney for the Central District of California. He has been unlawfully serving in that capacity since his resignation from the interim role on July 29, 2025.' Despite this, the judge allowed Essayli to continue as first assistant U.S. attorney—a position that conveniently requires no Senate confirmation, further demonstrating how these appointments are manipulated to bypass accountability. Seabright also refused to dismiss indictments in three cases challenged by defense attorneys, noting that other prosecutors had signed the indictments and that Essayli’s involvement had not yet resulted in due process violations. This decision is yet another example of the judiciary pushing back against the Trump administration’s reckless disregard for legal norms, following similar rulings in New Jersey and Nevada where courts found acting U.S. attorneys were unlawfully installed. The Department of Justice, clinging to the Federal Vacancies Reform Act, continues to defend these appointments, but Judge Seabright’s decision signals a growing judicial resistance to executive overreach. As of now, the Department of Justice has not announced if it will appeal, and Essayli’s office remains silent—perhaps unable to justify yet another abuse of power.

Fact-checking

Fact-check the facts of the article using external sources and databases.

✓
Confirmed

A federal judge has disqualified Bill Essayli from serving as the acting U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California, ruling that his appointment violated federal law.

✓
Confirmed

Judge J. Michael Seabright determined that Essayli had been unlawfully serving in the role since July 29, 2025, when he transitioned from interim U.S. Attorney to acting U.S. Attorney.

✓
Confirmed

Despite this ruling, Judge Seabright allowed Essayli to continue serving as the first assistant U.S. attorney, a position that does not require Senate confirmation.

✓
Confirmed

The judge also declined to dismiss indictments in three cases where defense attorneys had challenged Essayli's authority, noting that other prosecutors had lawfully signed the indictments and that Essayli's involvement did not appear to have caused due process violations.

✓
Confirmed

This decision is part of a broader pattern of judicial challenges to the Trump administration's appointments of acting U.S. attorneys without Senate confirmation.

✓
Confirmed

Similar rulings have occurred in New Jersey and Nevada, where courts found that acting U.S. attorneys were not validly serving in their roles.

✓
Confirmed

The Department of Justice has argued that Essayli's appointment was valid under the Federal Vacancies Reform Act, which allows certain officials to temporarily perform the duties of vacant positions requiring Senate confirmation.

✓
Confirmed

As of now, the Department of Justice has not announced whether it will appeal the decision.

Keep reading — for free

Create a free account to follow the news. No card required.