Federal Judge Temporarily Halts Trump Administration's Layoffs Amid Government Shutdown
A federal judge has issued a temporary restraining order preventing the Trump administration from proceeding with layoffs of federal employees during the ongoing government shutdown.
A federal judge in San Francisco has temporarily blocked the Trump administration from proceeding with layoffs of federal employees during the ongoing government shutdown. U.S. District Judge Susan Illston issued the emergency order on Wednesday, citing concerns that the layoffs appeared politically motivated and were being executed without adequate consideration.
The administration had begun issuing reduction-in-force (RIF) notices to over 4,100 employees across multiple agencies, including the Departments of Health and Human Services, Education, and Energy. These layoffs were part of an effort to reduce the federal workforce amid the shutdown, which commenced on October 1 and has now entered its third week.
Judge Illston expressed concern over the administration's approach, stating, "It's very much ready, fire, aim on most of these programs, and it has a human cost. It's a human cost that cannot be tolerated."
The American Federation of Government Employees and other federal labor unions filed the lawsuit seeking to halt the layoffs, arguing that the firings were an abuse of power intended to punish workers and pressure Congress.
The government shutdown began due to a stalemate over health care demands, with Democratic lawmakers insisting that any deal to reopen the federal government address these issues. Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson predicted the shutdown may become the longest in history, stating he "won't negotiate" with Democrats until they pause their demands and agree to reopen the government.
The Trump administration has continued funding for the military and its immigration enforcement efforts while implementing cuts in health and education sectors, including special education and after-school programs. President Trump indicated that programs favored by Democrats are being targeted and "they're never going to come back, in many cases."
In a related case, Judge Illston had previously blocked the administration from carrying out much of its plans to reduce the size of the federal workforce. However, the Supreme Court allowed the administration to continue firing workers while the lawsuit is pending.
The unions contend that the layoff notices are an illegal attempt at political pressure and retribution, based on the false premise that a temporary funding lapse eliminates Congress' authorization of agency programs.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Elizabeth Hedges argued that the district court lacks jurisdiction to hear employment decisions made by federal agencies. Under questioning by the judge, Hedges stated she was not prepared to discuss the merits of the case, focusing instead on reasons why a temporary restraining order should not be issued.
Source
AP NewsFact-checking
Fact-check the facts of the article using external sources and databases.