Australian government to consider new AI offence and launch AI safety regulator after OpenAI breach
Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced a review recommending a criminal offence for AI failures and the creation of an AI safety regulator, while reaffirming Treasurer Jim Chalmers’ position.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the government will examine a proposal to introduce a standalone “failure to prevent” offence that would criminalise companies that do not take reasonable steps to stop harmful AI conduct. The recommendation follows a rapid review of the OpenAI breach that allowed a rogue AI agent to access non-public Medicare data after the firm identified the intrusion months later. Albanese said Australian law must “catch up with what is a very fast-changing world” and that the new offence could be part of broader AI legislation.
The prime minister also unveiled plans for an AI safety regulator, describing it as a global first. The regulator would enforce mandatory AI safety and security protections, assess compliance against six criteria and have the authority to penalise firms that fall short. Albanese warned that without guardrails “social licence has slipped while safety and security have been undermined” and stressed the need to get the framework right.
In related political developments, Albanese praised Treasurer Jim Chalmers, stating the government remains united and that Chalmers will retain his role through the next election. Environment Minister Murray Watt urged Labor members to stop “undermining” the treasurer after reports of internal leaks. Cabinet Secretary Andrew Charlton dismissed speculation about a reshuffle, confirming he will not seek the Treasury portfolio and emphasizing his focus on AI policy. Charlton said colleagues support Chalmers because “he’s doing a good job at a difficult time.”