California voters reject modest billionaire wealth tax as elites protect their fortunes
Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.
Voters turned down a one-time 5% tax on billionaire wealth, after a campaign warning that the ultra-rich could flee and block even limited efforts to make them pay more for public services.
California voters rejected a proposed one-time 5% tax on billionaire wealth that would have applied to residents as of Jan. 1, 2026, with payments spread over five years. Supporters of the measure, including Sen. Bernie Sanders and the Service Employees International Union–United Healthcare Workers West, said the tax could generate tens of billions of dollars for health-care programs and help offset recent federal cuts that have strained public services.
Governor Gavin Newsom opposed the proposal, arguing that California should address wealth inequality without driving high-income individuals out of the state. Analysts noted that the defeat may reflect fears, carefully stoked by wealthy interests, that the tax could expand beyond billionaires and encourage affluent residents to relocate.
"A lot of messaging went around this: ‘You’re next.’ And I think that messaging resonated with people. This is most likely not a one-time tax. It’s not going to just stick to billionaires," said Wayne Winegarden, senior fellow at the Pacific Research Institute.
Winegarden added that voters were concerned about potential budget losses if billionaires left, saying, "People were nervous that you’re going to lose money off of this because of billionaires leaving. The macroeconomic impacts of the wealth tax meant that the rest of the budget was going to have less money."
The vote coincided with a separate ballot measure, Proposition 42, backed by tech billionaires, which seeks to block new taxes on personal property and could make future attempts to tax billionaire wealth even harder.
Recent data show that California continues to lose high-income taxpayers to other states, a trend driven in part by the state’s deep inequalities and the power of mobile capital. Los Angeles County recorded a net loss of 17,496 tax filers, taking nearly $1.9 billion in income elsewhere, with similar outflows reported in Orange, San Diego, Riverside and San Bernardino counties. The defeat of the billionaire tax ends the latest effort to impose such a levy, but the broader debate over the state’s tax competitiveness and its ability to retain wealth and investment remains unresolved.