Voters reject most data-center ballot measures as states resist anti-growth restrictions
Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.
Ballotpedia analysis shows voters in ten states opposed 40 of 41 local measures seeking to limit data-center construction, with only one measure in North Dakota passing. The results point to broad skepticism toward regulatory roadblocks that could hinder investment, jobs and technological progress.
Voters in ten states rejected 40 of 41 local ballot measures that would have imposed new limits on data-center construction, according to Ballotpedia and a CNBC analysis released after Election Night. The sole measure that passed was in Harwood, North Dakota, where voters rejected a charter amendment that would have required additional review for industrial projects, including data centers.
In Ohio, 21 measures were on the ballot. The state, highlighted by CNBC as a leading business environment, is the site of the planned PORTS-Pike Technology Campus, a joint effort by OpenAI, SoftBank, SB Energy and the U.S. Department of Energy. The campus is expected to begin construction this year, with phased capacity coming online from 2028 and a total projected cost exceeding $500 billion.
A CNBC voter poll found that 56 % of respondents said data-center issues were a “crucial or major” factor in their voting decisions, with higher concern among Democrats than Republicans. Democratic candidates who advocated for pausing or regulating new projects won races in Ohio, Wisconsin, Georgia and Texas.
Following the results, Rep. Greg Casar, who chairs the Congressional Progressive Caucus, called for AI executives to testify under oath, stating that the House Democratic majority should prioritize protecting jobs and public interests from AI-related influences.
The outcomes suggest that local opposition to data-center expansion could pose challenges to the AI industry’s growth plans in the United States, especially where activists and regulators try to slow development that many communities and businesses see as vital to economic competitiveness.