House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries sets confrontational agenda after midterm win
Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.
Democrats tout their House gain and promise action on affordability, housing, education, health care and corruption, while bracing for the reality of a Republican president and the need to negotiate with him and the Senate.
House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries addressed supporters in Washington, D.C., after the midterm elections gave Democrats a majority in the House. He said the results show that the public wants change and pledged that the party will focus on making the country more affordable.
"We're going to fight to make sure that we make this country affordable for every single American," Jeffries said, adding that Democrats intend to work on affordable housing, education, health care and retirement benefits.
Jeffries noted that Democrats faced a financial disadvantage in the campaign, with Republicans outspending them in many races, and said voters have rejected political extremism and corruption. He promised to pursue accountability measures aimed at officials who use public office for personal gain, presenting that effort as a necessary response to abuse in government.
The shift in congressional control ends a period of Republican-led majorities in the House and limits President Trump’s ability to advance his agenda through legislation, though the president retains veto power. Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson, speaking in Shreveport, Louisiana, acknowledged the loss and described the election outcome as a historic setback for his party.
Analysts note that while Democrats now control the House, implementing their agenda will require negotiation with the Senate and the president’s administration, underscoring that even with a House majority they cannot simply impose their priorities without broader agreement.