Israeli Study Challenges Genocide Allegations in Gaza Conflict
Just the facts

Israeli Study Challenges Genocide Allegations in Gaza Conflict

Summary

A comprehensive report by Israeli researchers disputes claims of genocide in Gaza, citing misrepresented data and Hamas's use of human shields.

A recent 300-page report by Israeli researchers challenges allegations that Israel committed genocide during the Gaza conflict. The study, conducted by military historians Prof. Danny Orbach and Dr. Yagil Henkin, quantitative analyst Dr. Jonathan Boxman, and international law expert Jonathan Braverman, scrutinizes claims of deliberate starvation and indiscriminate attacks on civilians.

The authors argue that accusations of intentional starvation are based on statistical errors. They note that pre-war aid deliveries were measured per working day, while post-war figures were averaged over all calendar days, leading to misleading comparisons. The study also highlights Hamas's use of civilian infrastructure for military purposes, complicating Israel's military operations.

Prof. Orbach stated that to prove genocide, it must be shown that Israel aimed to maximize civilian casualties, which the study finds unsubstantiated. The report acknowledges potential violations of the laws of war but concludes these do not constitute genocide. It warns that overusing the term 'genocide' could diminish its significance and hinder responses to actual genocidal threats.

Fact-checking

Fact-check the facts of the article using external sources and databases.

✓
Confirmed

A recent 300-page report by Israeli researchers challenges allegations that Israel committed genocide during the Gaza conflict.

✓
Confirmed

The study was conducted by military historians Prof. Danny Orbach and Dr. Yagil Henkin, quantitative analyst Dr. Jonathan Boxman, and international law expert Jonathan Braverman.

✓
Confirmed

The study highlights Hamas's use of civilian infrastructure for military purposes.

✓
Confirmed

Prof. Orbach stated that to prove genocide, it must be shown that Israel aimed to maximize civilian casualties.

✓
Confirmed

The report acknowledges potential violations of the laws of war but concludes these do not constitute genocide.

✓
Confirmed

The report warns that overusing the term 'genocide' could diminish its significance and hinder responses to actual genocidal threats.

!
Partly Confirmed

The authors argue that accusations of intentional starvation are based on statistical errors.

✕
Not Confirmed

The study claims pre-war aid deliveries were measured per working day, while post-war figures were averaged over all calendar days.

Keep reading — for free

Create a free account to follow the news. No card required.