Palestinian Voter Surge Gives Arab Parties Potential Kingmaker Role in Israeli Parliament
A record turnout among Palestinian citizens of Israel secured 19 seats for Arab parties, positioning them to influence the formation of the next government despite opposition leaders' reluctance to cooperate.
A high turnout of Palestinian citizens of Israel in the recent parliamentary election has given the United Arab List (Ra’am) and the Joint List a combined 19 seats in the 120-member Knesset, making them a potential decisive bloc in coalition talks. Approximately 80 percent of eligible Palestinian voters participated, reflecting the community’s 21 percent share of the population.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud party emerged as the largest single party but fell short of a governing majority, holding 53 seats. The opposition bloc, composed of various Jewish parties, secured 48 seats. With the Arab bloc’s 19 seats, a coalition excluding Netanyahu would command a parliamentary majority.
Netanyahu’s Likud has called for an investigation by the Shin Bet security service into possible foreign interference in the Palestinian turnout, framing the surge as a threat to Israel’s character. Opposition leaders Naftali Bennett, Yair Lapid and Avigdor Lieberman publicly ruled out forming a government with Palestinian parties, despite having previously relied on their support.
"It was clear from campaigning that there was going to be a large turnout," said Orly Noy of the Balad party, noting concerns over security policies and rising crime.
"The last tool Palestinians had that was equal to everyone else was their vote, and now it seems to be undermined," Noy added.
Political analyst Nimrod Flaschenberg said the Arab vote challenges the prevailing assumption of Jewish supremacy in Israeli politics, a stance reinforced by the 2018 Nation State Law. He warned that the differing visions for Israel’s future reflect deeper societal divisions.
Mauricio Lapchik, campaign director for the Joint List, argued that the Arab parties’ electoral success should be recognized as a legitimate victory, but noted that their influence is often dismissed in the current political climate.