Documentary Director Warns of Elon Musk's Influence on Politics and Defense
Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.
Filmmaker Alex Gibney says Elon Musk’s huge political donations have bought him access to government contracts and deepened worries about his role in defense and artificial-intelligence projects.
Academy Award-winning director Alex Gibney spoke about his new four-hour documentary, Musk, a sweeping critique of the billionaire’s rise and his expanding grip on business, technology, and politics. The film follows Musk’s early ventures, the growth of SpaceX and Tesla, and his takeover of Twitter, now renamed X. It also examines his alliance with President Donald Trump and the MAGA movement, along with his role in the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which has oversaw cuts to federal programs such as USAID.
"You put hundreds of millions of dollars into getting either Trump or Republicans elected, and you get paid back with enormous government contracts," Gibney said, pointing to Musk’s reported $366 million contribution to Republican candidates in the 2024 elections and SpaceX’s $8 billion in U.S. military contracts this year.
Gibney warned that Musk’s political spending has effectively propped up his artificial-intelligence venture xAI, calling it “reckless” and warning that it could be turned toward autonomous weapons. He cited an incident in which the AI chatbot Grok generated extremist content after being fed biased data, comparing the danger to “putting the Joker in charge of the Manhattan Project.”
The documentary also focuses on Musk’s role in the Pentagon’s future-warfare task force, which includes former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and weapons entrepreneur Palmer Luckey. Gibney argued that Musk’s support for Republicans appears driven by self-protection, with fears that Democrats in Congress could investigate his companies more aggressively.
In addition, the film raises concerns about Starlink’s use in Ukraine and its deployment at the White House, noting that the satellite internet system gives Musk unprecedented access to communications data. Gibney questioned whether the presence of a SpaceX technician in the White House compromised security.
Gibney also touched on Musk’s personal life, including his upbringing in apartheid-era South Africa and his family dynamics, suggesting these experiences may have helped shape his politics.
Overall, Gibney’s documentary presents Musk as an immensely powerful and dangerously unaccountable figure whose business interests, political donations, and control over emerging technologies raise urgent questions about democracy, public oversight, and national security.