Data Center Expansion Tests GOP Unity as Trump Pushes America-First Growth Ahead of 2026 Midterms
Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.
A surge in data center construction across Republican states is creating a policy clash between President Trump’s drive for innovation, jobs, and national competitiveness and GOP candidates responding to local concerns.
The rapid growth of data centers built to support artificial-intelligence workloads is becoming a defining issue for Republican office-seekers as the 2026 midterm elections approach. Cleanview Research reports that 75% of facilities under construction and 80% of those in planning are located in predominantly Republican states, a shift from the early AI era when most centers were sited in blue states.
Analyst Chris Millay of Greenmantle noted that “Red states have more of a history of accepting large, energy-intensive, infrastructure projects — even those that might have detrimental effects on communities,” citing looser environmental regulations and abundant land as factors attracting investment. That reality has made Republican states the natural home for the infrastructure needed to keep America competitive in AI.
President Trump, emphasizing the economic and security importance of the AI sector, told a rally in Ohio, “We want them … look, there's so much money to be made for Ohio — you can't just turn them off. They'll go to China.” He has also urged developers to contribute to local communities through education, lower taxes, job creation and energy-cost protections, highlighting a practical America-First approach that seeks both growth and community benefit.
Local opposition is rising, with residents near data centers reporting concerns about property values, noise, higher energy bills and resource depletion. Polls show a 30-point gap favoring opposition, and a New York Times/Siena poll indicates that Ohio Republican Sen. Jon Husted trails his opponent on the issue by 11 points, showing that the debate is politically sensitive even where the projects are bringing investment.
Some GOP officials are distancing themselves from the president’s line. Texas Governor Greg Abbott, seeking a fourth term, has paused environmental permits and grid connections for new data centers, while Attorney General Ken Paxton proposes ending the state’s sales-tax break for the facilities and holding operators criminally liable for AI applications that endanger children.
In Ohio, Democratic gubernatorial nominee Amy Acton called for a conditional moratorium on data centers, whereas Republican candidate Vivek Ramaswamy pledged an executive order to halt new approvals until an “Ohioans-First” law requiring free electricity for nearby residents is passed.
Campaign advertising reflects the divide, with $45 million spent on ads mentioning data centers this year, most of which criticize the projects. In Georgia, Republican gubernatorial candidate Rick Jackson supports the president’s approach, arguing that local officials should decide and noting that some counties expect to use data-center revenue to reduce property taxes.
The outcome of these intraparty debates may shape the future of data-center development in states that supported President Trump in the 2024 election, influencing whether projects proceed, become more costly, or are halted.