California gubernatorial candidates Becerra and Hilton debate ahead of November vote
Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.
Democratic front-runner Xavier Becerra and Republican challenger Steve Hilton sparred over Governor Gavin Newsom’s record and a proposed billionaire tax as they seek to win voters before the midterm elections.
Democratic candidate Xavier Becerra and Republican Steve Hilton faced each other in a televised debate on Tuesday, each offering a one-word assessment of Governor Gavin Newsom’s tenure. Hilton, who is supported by President Donald Trump, described Newsom’s performance as a “failure,” while Becerra called it “game-changing.”
The candidates also weighed in on Proposition 40, a ballot measure that would impose a one-time 5% tax on Californians with net worths over $1 billion. The proposal, backed by progressive figures such as Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative Ro Khanna, is promoted as a way to raise tens of billions for health care, education and food assistance. Newsom has opposed the tax, warning it could drive businesses out of the state.
Becerra aligned with Newsom’s stance, saying he would support other tax initiatives like Proposition 3, which makes higher income tax rates permanent for high earners to fund schools. Hilton strongly opposed the billionaire tax, arguing it could push wealthy residents and employers out of California and strain the economy.
The debate also touched on broader issues. Becerra blamed rising gas prices on the war in Iran and higher grocery costs on tariffs, while Hilton attributed the state’s challenges to Democratic leadership. When questioned about his long-standing support for a single-payer health system, Becerra defended his position against claims he was distancing himself from Medicare for All. He also denied involvement in a campaign-fund theft case linked to a former chief of staff, urging critics to read the indictment.
Both candidates sought to position themselves as the experienced choice for the state’s most populous electorate as the November ballot approaches.