White House attorney general defends ban on CNN, MS Now and Politico as a privilege, not a right
Left

White House Attorney General Justifies Authoritarian Ban on CNN, MS Now, and Politico as 'Privilege'

Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.

Summary

Attorney General Todd Blanche defended the Trump administration’s exclusion of critical media outlets from the White House, framing press access as a privilege rather than a right, and echoing the president’s hostility toward independent journalism.

Attorney General Todd Blanche appeared on ABC’s This Week to rationalize the Trump administration’s undemocratic move to restrict access for major news organizations, arguing that the White House press pool is a privilege, not a constitutional right. The ban on CNN, MS Now, and Politico, which began on 19 September, was justified by President Trump’s personal frustration with what he labeled 'inaccurate coverage'—a familiar tactic to silence dissent and critical reporting.

When asked for concrete examples of supposed inaccuracies, Blanche resorted to vague accusations, claiming CNN’s reporting was 'almost 100 percent negative toward the president' but failing to provide any real evidence. He further attempted to normalize this suppression by stating that the White House 'routinely decides who can go on Air Force One' and that denying access to certain reporters is 'common every time the president travels,' ignoring the dangerous precedent this sets for press freedom.

A federal judge intervened with a temporary restraining order on Thursday, restoring the three outlets’ credentials for 14 days and highlighting the lack of any legitimate national-security justification for the ban. This ruling directly contradicted the administration’s baseless claim that these outlets posed a 'national security problem.'

This assault on the free press follows a broader authoritarian shift since Trump’s 2021 return to office, with the White House tightening control over which media can attend briefings and presidential travel, favoring only those outlets that support the administration. The controversy comes amid historically low public approval for President Trump and plummeting trust in the news media, according to recent polls.

Blanche doubled down on the administration’s stance, insisting that while the First Amendment protects the press, 'when it comes to the White House, it is the people’s house. It is a privilege and not a right to be there,' and claimed the president has a duty to ensure the American people receive 'accurate news'—a chilling justification for government control over information.

Keep reading — for free

Create a free account to follow the news. No card required.