Federal Judge to Decide Whether White House Must Restore Press Passes After Authoritarian Crackdown on CNN, Politico and MS NOW
Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.
A Trump-appointed federal judge held an emergency hearing after the White House, in a blatant attack on press freedom, suspended the press credentials of CNN, Politico, and MS NOW, raising serious due-process concerns.
U.S. District Judge Timothy J. Kelly, appointed by President Trump, presided over an emergency hearing Wednesday after the White House, in a disturbing escalation against independent journalism, revoked the permanent press passes of CNN, Politico, and MS NOW. The lawsuit brought by these outlets highlights the administration’s disregard for constitutional protections and its willingness to silence critical voices.
"The White House appears to have violated the news outlets' constitutional right of due process," Kelly stated, acknowledging the grave threat to democratic norms.
Attorney Theodore J. Boutrous, representing the targeted organizations, condemned the administration’s move as a retaliatory act against unfavorable coverage, implemented without any procedural safeguards. He emphasized that this was a direct assault on First Amendment rights and warned that the media companies were suffering irreparable harm, particularly as they attempt to cover vital international diplomatic events.
The Justice Department, represented by Michael Velchik, attempted to justify the crackdown by claiming that White House access is a privilege, not a right, and invoked vague national-security concerns. They referenced letters criticizing the outlets’ reporting on issues such as a proposed underground bunker, negotiations with Iran, and political convention commentary—classic tactics to chill dissent and intimidate the press.
Boutrous exposed the administration’s shifting justifications, pointing out that the so-called security rationale only surfaced after the ban was imposed. Judge Kelly withheld an immediate ruling, promising to review the arguments and issue a decision soon, as the struggle for press freedom hangs in the balance.