Justice Department Upholds Trump’s Ban on Biased News Outlets to Protect National Security and Integrity
Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.
The Justice Department is standing behind President Trump’s decision to revoke White House credentials from CNN, MS NOW, and Politico, citing serious national-security and professionalism concerns, while the outlets—known for their anti-Trump bias—claim their First Amendment and due-process rights are being violated.
Washington – The Justice Department has filed a brief defending President Trump’s justified decision to strip CNN, MS NOW, and Politico of their White House press credentials. The administration asserts that these outlets’ reporting posed national-security risks and failed to meet the high standards expected of journalists covering the White House. The filing, submitted to a federal district court in Washington, D.C., makes clear that access to the White House is a privilege, not a right, especially when so-called journalists cross the line by publishing classified or sensitive information and failing to uphold basic professionalism. The department included letters from the White House press office to each outlet, revoking their 'hard passes' due to 'verifiable falsehoods about national security' and repeated violations of decorum. These actions are necessary to maintain the integrity of the White House press corps and protect the nation from irresponsible reporting. The letters set a Friday deadline for response, countering the outlets’ baseless claims that they were denied due process. Predictably, CNN, MS NOW, and Politico have sued the president and his senior aides, alleging violations of the First Amendment and viewpoint discrimination. They have requested U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly, who previously sided with CNN during the Trump administration, to restore their credentials. The Justice Department’s strong argument comes ahead of a Wednesday hearing, where the court will determine whether the administration’s actions were lawful. While dozens of other media organizations have filed an amicus brief supporting the plaintiffs, the administration’s stance is clear: protecting national security and journalistic standards must come before the demands of biased media outlets.