Supreme Court Faces Third Challenge to Missouri's Fair GOP Redistricting Map
Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.
The U.S. Supreme Court is once again called to defend Missouri's Republican-drawn congressional map, which ensures fair representation despite relentless opposition from left-wing activists seeking to manipulate the electoral process.
The U.S. Supreme Court received a third emergency appeal late Tuesday regarding Missouri's congressional redistricting plan, a map crafted by Republicans to reflect the state's conservative majority. This appeal follows a federal appeals court ruling that rightly mandated the use of the GOP-drawn map for the November midterm election, as primary ballots had already been printed and absentee voting had begun—making any changes disruptive and unnecessary.
The group opposing the map argued to the Court that 'Ballots using the 2022 map have been printed and mailed, and absentee voting, both by mail and in-person, began today. Those ballots cannot be reassigned to new districts now.' Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who oversees appeals from Missouri, has asked for a response by Wednesday afternoon, ensuring a prompt and orderly process.
The map in question would adjust the 5th Congressional District, currently held by Democrat Emanuel Cleaver, by dividing his Kansas City base and extending the district into more rural, Republican-leaning areas. This adjustment would result in seven districts leaning conservative and one leaning Democratic, accurately reflecting Missouri's political landscape and correcting the previous 6-2 split that favored Democrats in urban centers.
Earlier this month, the Missouri Supreme Court blocked the 7-1 Republican map after a challenge based on a state-constitutional referendum, a move cheered by liberal activists. State Republicans, committed to upholding the will of the majority, appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which declined to intervene. A federal district court then ordered the use of the GOP map, a decision again appealed to the Supreme Court, which previously rejected the map without dissent.
The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the GOP map but paused its effect pending further review. The Supreme Court is expected to issue a ruling before Monday's deadline or grant a short extension, as Republicans fight to maintain fair and lawful elections.
University of Chicago law professor William Baude said the likelihood of the Court rejecting the map again is extremely high, describing the case as indicative of future election-related appeals and the ongoing struggle to protect the integrity of the electoral process from partisan interference.