Republican Lawmakers Split Over Trump's $5,000 Dividend Proposal
Cleared

Republican Lawmakers Split Over Trump's $5,000 Dividend Proposal

Select a version of the text written from a presumed ideological perspective. This is not the original text, but a hypothetical version — how someone with that viewpoint might have phrased it. Tapping the current version again will return to the original or select cleaned version.

Summary

House Republicans are divided on President Trump's pledge to issue $5,000 checks to Americans, with several members questioning its cost, legality and impact on inflation.

President Donald Trump has pledged to deliver $5,000 checks to Americans if Republicans win control of Congress, but the proposal faces mixed reactions among GOP lawmakers. Rep. Ralph Norman (R-SC) said he disagrees with the plan, calling it "pay-to-play" and questioning how it would be funded amid a $40 trillion national debt. House Appropriations Committee Chairman Tom Cole (R-OK) expressed skepticism about the feasibility of the stimulus, noting that no bill currently exists and suggesting the funds could be better used for defense or Social Security. Rep. John Rutherford (R-FL) indicated conditional support, emphasizing the need to avoid triggering inflation and limiting payments to working taxpayers. Rep. Beth Van Duyne (R-TX) warned that "the devil's always in the details" and urged focus on job-creation measures. Rep. Brad Knott (R-NC) favored structured tax incentives over unconditional checks. In contrast, Freedom Caucus Chairman Andy Harris (R-MD) supported a tax rebate for hardworking Americans, proposing that the amount be negotiated and possibly passed through a reconciliation process. Republican Study Committee Chairman August Pfluger (R-TX) suggested funding the dividend from savings recovered by cracking down on waste, fraud and abuse. Estimates place the cost of a $5,000 payment to every adult at roughly $1 trillion, a sum that would traditionally require congressional approval. Trump has said he believes Congress will act if needed, but has not confirmed whether legislative endorsement is required.

Source

Fox News

Keep reading — for free

Create a free account to follow the news. No card required.